Can a shoulder continuous passive motion device be considered functionally safe after rotator cuff repair? An in-vivo study of evasive motion, muscle activation, and patient feedback

Julia Scharbert; Gerda Strutzenberger ; Lisa Hainzer ; Philipp Baumert ; Sepp Braun

Abstract

Background: Early mobilization without muscle activation is important after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Motor-driven continuous passive motion (CPM) devices may support rehabilitation, but it is unclear whether motion remains passive or setup errors could push joint motion beyond ROM limits.Purpose: To assess whether patients can relax shoulder musculature and avoid evasive movements during CPM, and to quantify how altered device setup affects joint motion and muscle activity.Methods: Shoulder kinematics and bilateral surface EMG of four shoulder muscles were recorded during CPM-guided abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation using 3D motion capture. Patients completed 10 min in the “optimal” setup, followed by four suboptimal positioning conditions (2 min each). Patients then used the CPM device at home for 4 weeks and reported pain, comfort, compliance, and satisfaction.Results: Thirteen patients (56.9±6.6 years) were assessed 12.9±2.8 days after arthroscopic RCR. Actual ROM differed from device-guided ROM (p<0.001), but discrepancies were similar between sides (p>0.05) and remained below approved limits (50-90° abduction and 0-30° external rotation). Suboptimal positioning showed a main effect on ROM (p<0.015); post-hoc differences occurred only for abduction (p=0.002) and remained within safe limits. Muscle activity stayed low and below activation thresholds; deltoid and upper trapezius activation remained within acceptable limits. Pain and discomfort were low (≤0.72±0.96 and ≤0.87±0.91; 0–10 scales), abduction ROM improved from 37±16° to 46±19°, and satisfaction was high (reuse willingness 9.1±1.58/10).Conclusion: Early after RCR, the CPM device provides safe passive shoulder mobilization with very low muscle activation, limited sensitivity to setup errors, low pain/discomfort, and high acceptance.What this study adds: CPM remains genuinely passive with very low muscle activation, while shoulder kinematics stay within approved ROM limits even with moderate setup errors; it is well tolerated by first-time users.Implications for research, practice or policy: These findings support CPM as a safe, feasible adjunct to early rehabilitation and provide a biomechanical rationale for future clinical trials and guideline recommendations on CPM use after RCR.Study Design: Experimental laboratory studyLevel of evidence: IVKeywords: postoperative rehabilitation, early postoperative mobilization, passive range-of-motion, glenohumeral kinematics, compensatory motion, surface electromyography, 3D motion trackinghttps://doi.org/10.70885/hmsj.2026.03.002

References

  1. Akeson WH, Amiel D, Abel MF, et al. Effects of Immobilization on Joints. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1987;219(June 1987):28–37
  2. Koo SS, Burkhart SS. Rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Clinics in Sports Medicine 2010;29(2):203-11, vii DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2009.12.001
  3. Cummins CA, Murrell GAC. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12(2):128–133 DOI: 10.1067/mse.2003.21
  4. McCarthy M. R., O'Donoghue P. C., Yates C. K., et al. The Clinical Use of Continuous Passive Motion in Physical Therapy. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1992;15(3) DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1992.15.3.132
  5. Salter RB, Bell RS, Keeley FW. The Protective Effect of Continuous Passive Motion on Living Articular Cartilage in Acute Septic Arthritis: An Experimental Investigation in the Rabbit. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 1981;159(September 1981):223
  6. Salter RB, Simmonds DF, Malcolm BW, et al. The biological effect of continuous passive motion on the healing of full-thickness defects in articular cartilage. An experimental investigation in the rabbit. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62(8):1232–1251
  7. Ferretti M, Srinivasan A, Deschner J, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of continuous passive motion on meniscal fibrocartilage. Journal Orthopaedic Research 2005;23(5):1165–1171 DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.025
  8. O'Driscoll s. W., Giori N. J. Continuous passive motion (CPM): theory and principles of clinical application. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 2000;37(2):79–188
  9. Salter RB, Hamilton HW, Wedge JH, et al. Clinical application of basic research on continuous passive motion for disorders and injuries of synovial joints: A preliminary report of a feasibility study. Techniques in Orthopaedics 1986;1(1):74 DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100010313
  10. Mclnnes J. A Controlled Evaluation of Continuous Passive Motion in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. JAMA 1992;268(11):1423 DOI: 10.1001/jama.268.11.1423
  11. McCarthy M. R. The effects of immediate continuous passive motion on the clinical signs of soft tissue healing following an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Dissertation. University of Virginia 1990 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1993.17.2.96
  12. Brislin KJ, Field LD, Savoie FH. Complications after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 2007;23(2):124– 128 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.09.001
  13. Garofalo R, Conti M, Notarnicola A, et al. Effects of one-month continuous passive motion after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: results at 1-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study. MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY 2010;94 Suppl 1(S1):S79-83 DOI: 10.1007/s12306-010-0058-7
  14. Schulze C, Knaack F, Goosmann M, et al. Kontinuierliche passive Bewegungstherapie (CPM-Therapie) in der orthopädischen Rehabilitation am Schultergelenk – eine Literaturübersicht. Die Rehabilitation 2021;60(6):364–373 DOI: 10.1055/a-1500-8567
  15. Tille E, Lorenz F, Beyer F, et al. Early functional improvements using continuous passive motion therapy after angular-stable plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures - results of a prospective, randomized trial. Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2024;19(1):313 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04804-x
  16. Akdoğan E, Taçgın E, Adli MA. Knee rehabilitation using an intelligent robotic system. J Intell Manuf 2009;20(2):195–202
  17. Adams KM, Thompson ST. CONTINUOUS PASSIVE MOTION USE IN HAND THERAPY. Hand Clinics 1996;12(1):109–127
  18. Jaeger T., Hassenpflug J. CPM treatment of the shoulder joint. Orthopaede 1991(20(4)):282–286
  19. Horse JS. Improving clinical outcomes with continuous passive motion: an interactive education approach. Orthopaedic Nursing 2010(Volume 29):27–33 DOI: 10.1097/NOR.0b013e3181c8cd46
  20. Kim Y-S, Chung SW, Kim JY, et al. Is early passive motion exercise necessary after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? Am J Sports Med 2012;40(4):815–821 DOI: 10.1177/0363546511434287
  21. Bible JE, Simpson AK, Biswas D, et al. Actual knee motion during continuous passive motion protocols is less than expected. Clinical orthopaedics and related research 2009;467(10):2656–2661 DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0766-1
  22. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Merletti R, Haegg G, Stegeman D, Blok J. European Recommendations for Surface Electromyography; 1999
  23. Halaki M, Ginn K. Normalization of EMG Signals: To Normalize or Not to Normalize and What to Normalize to? In: Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis - a Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges InTech; 2012
  24. Powell D, Muthumani A, Xia R-P. Normalizing EMG to Background Muscle Activation Masks Medication-Induced Reductions in Reflex Amplitudes in Parkinsonian Rigidity. Journal of nature and science 2017;3(2):e315
  25. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics 1979; 6(2):65– 70
  26. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological bulletin 1992;112(1):155–159 DOI: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155
  27. Umchid S, Taraphongphan P. Design and Development of a Smart Continuous Passive Motion Device for Knee Rehabilitation. In: 2016 9th Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON) IEEE; 2016; pp. 1–5 DOI:10.1109/BMEiCON.2016.7859616
  28. Thigpen CA, Shaffer MA, Gaunt BW, et al. The American Society of Shoulder and Elbow Therapists' consensus statement on rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25(4):521– 535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.12.018
  29. Umehara J, Yagi M, Hirono T, et al. Quantification of muscle coordination underlying basic shoulder movements using muscle synergy extraction. Journal of biomechanics 2021;120:110358 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110358
  30. MacDermid JC, Ramos J, Drosdowech D, et al. The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004;13(6):593–598 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.03.009
  31. Yen D. Limitations of isokinetic testing to determine shoulder strength after rotator cuff repair. The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2005;25:141–144
  32. Lädermann A, Denard P, Collin P, et al. Sling Versus No Sling After Superior Rotator Cuff Repair: A Propensity Score Matched, Longitudinal, Observational Study At Mid-Term Follow-Up. HMSJ 2025; 1(1). DOI: 10.70885/hmsj.2025.01.003
  33. Michael JW-P, König DP, Imhoff AB, et al. Effektivität der postoperativen Behandlung mittels motorisierter Bewe- gungsschienen (CPM) bei Patienten mit Ruptur der Rotatorenmanschette. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2005;143(4):438–445 DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836806
  34. Raab MG, Rzeszutko D, O'Connor W, et al. Early results of continuous passive motion after rotator cuff repair: a prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 1996;25(3):214–220
  35. LaStayo PC, Wright T, Jaffe R, et al. Continuous passive motion after repair of the rotator cuff. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80(7):1002–1011. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199807000-00009
  36. Milne S., Brosseau L., Robinson V., et al. Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004260

Full text PDF